The Baltic Assembly Prize in Literature was awarded to Estonian writer Vahur Afanasjev for his novel “Serafima and Bogdan” (“Serafima ja Bogdan”).
The Jury noted that the story of Serafima and Bogdan paints a vivid picture of the characters’ exceptional world: the villages, lifestyle, religion and language of the Old Believers. “It is partly a fairy-tale, and partly an ethnographic portrayal of a community rich in traditions and history. Afanasjev’s mastery of style, detailed descriptions and metaphors make different feelings and actions clear to the reader. He pays special and acute attention to environment and details,” the materials of the Jury underline.
Head of the Estonian Delegation to the Baltic Assembly Aadu Must emphasised that in the Baltic cultural space, it was important to know the literature and culture life of one’s neighbours and to cooperate closely in this field as well. “The novel “Serafima and Bogdan” by Vahur Afanasjev, who unfortunately passed away young this year, is a pearl on the cultural landscape of our country, and as the history of our countries is similar, this book should also have a place on the reading table of our southern neighbours. We hope that it will soon be translated into Latvian and Lithuanian,” Must said.
The BA Prize in the Arts was awarded to Ginta Gerharde-Upeniece (Latvia), and the BA Prize in Science was awarded to Virginijus Šikšnys (Lithuania).
The Prize consists of a monetary prize, a certificate and a statuette, which are presented every year at the Baltic Assembly session. This year, the prize ceremony will be held in Vilnius on 4 November.
The members of the Joint Jury of the BA Prizes were outstanding specialists in the fields of literature, the arts and science from Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia: Valdemaras Razumas, Erika Drungytė, Petras Skirmantas, Rimantas Jankauskas, Bārbala Simsone, Diāna Lagūna, Guna Zeltiņa, Triin Soone, Piret Tibbo-Hudgins and Marika Mänd.
The Baltic Assembly has been awarding the Prizes in literature, the arts and science since 1994. The aim of the prizes is to promote outstanding achievements and to support the development of these fields in the Baltic States. Creation of opportunities to learn about the achievements of neighbouring countries, demonstrating the mutual interest of the countries in this region to uphold their national identity and self-esteem, and supporting outstanding achievements in literature, the arts and science strengthens the cooperation between the Baltic States and encourages people’s interest in the intellectual values and languages of the Baltic nations.
Today, Prime Minister Kaja Kallas made a political statement before the Riigikogu in connection with the submission of the State Budget for 2022 Bill. After the statements of the factions, the sitting continued with the deliberation of the matter of significant national importance “How to achieve a restriction-free Estonia?” initiated by the Estonian Centre Party Faction.
Prime Minister Kaja Kallas said that the presented state budget is the first from her government. “I am proud of this budget because it is a budget of good news, which will help us to keep the people in Estonia safe, and support the ongoing development of the Estonian economy,” Prime Minister said. “This caring and responsible state budget has come into being mainly thanks to the speedy recovery of our economy after the crisis.”
The revenue volume of the state budget is EUR 13.13 billion, the volume of expenditure is EUR 13.64 billion, and the volume of investments EUR 716 billion. Next year’s tax burden is 33.7 % of the GDP, so less than this year.
The Prime Minister highlighted the three main directions of the state budget – getting the daily expenditure of the state under control, investing into people, and ensuring a rapid a sustainable development for Estonia.
The government will start using the budget to patch up the hole that has been torn in the purse of the state over the last years, setting its sight on reducing the deficit to below 3% as early as next year. According to the budget, the state debt burden will remain within 20% of the GDP next year, reaching EUR 6.4 billion, and EUR 7.8 billion by 2025.
There are funds planned for increasing the salaries of teachers, health care workers, police officers, rescue workers, and cultural professionals. The minimum salary of teachers and cultural professionals will grow by more than 7%. The minimum salary of police officials will increase by nearly 5%, and for rescue workers by nearly 12%. The average pension would increase by 7%.
The minimum hourly pay for doctors and nurses will increase by more than 7%, and fore care workers by 10%. The salaries of care providers that are funded by the state will match those of the nursing staff.
Kallas also shone a light on the invisible victims of the pandemic, which is why the budget allocates funds for mental health, and finances activities to fill educational gaps for children. A family mediation system will also be built up.
The Bill should increase the revenue basis of local governments by more than EUR 100 million, complemented by more than EUR 10 million for children’s hobby education.
The Prime Minister affirmed that the defence budget will remain at two percent of the GDP. The next year’s budget will include EUR 103 million more for national defence compared to this year, taking the total to EUR 750 million, which forms 2.3% of the GDP.
The budget also allocated more funds to Estonian medium education. EUR 8 million is intended for developing Estonian medium education system and for involving an Estonian speaking assistant teacher in kindergarten and general education school classes with a different language of instruction.
EUR 30 million is allocated for developing the digital state and ensuring cyber security. R&D funding is increased by EUR 29.5 million to a total of around EUR 300 million.
The head of government said that all the excise duty increases that had been previously planned would not take place next year. “We will not increase excise duties because we do not want to accelerate the price hike. We also plan to add measures to the budget that compensate for the high price of electricity,” Kallas said. “If the price of electricity remains at an unreasonably high level for a long time, we will help to reduce its effect on our people and businesses. The people must not feel confused or anxious about possible price shocks on energy markets.”
Kallas added that the 2022 budget also contributes towards the further future goals mentioned in the strategy, as well as making sure that the Estonian people and the state are well taken care of in the present. She added that the European Commission would confirm a recovery plan for Estonia next week, which would attract investments into the green and digital projects of the public sector.
Representatives of the factions took the floor during the debate.
Helir-Valdor Seeder (Isamaa) was critical of the fact that the Bill did not include measures for alleviating the drastic rise in the price of electricity for Estonia’s economy. He listed hybrid warfare and problems with illegal border crossings as unresolved challenges, and deplored that the pressing issue of building border barriers as soon as possible wad been ignored. Seeder believed that the increase in the salaries of public sector workers was not enough to compensate for the inflation.
Seeder felt that it was an insult to the old age pensioners that the extraordinary increase in pensions and the income tax exemption on pensions will only become valid on 1 January 2023. He stressed that the pension reform has already started, people have already been paid out their money and the revenue on this has already reached the state budget this year, which is why the extraordinary increase in pensions should be carried out on 1 January 2022.
Martin Helme (Estonian Conservative People’s Party) also asked why the increase in pensions would not take place next year already, and reminded the Riigikogu that one of the objectives of the second pillar reform was to allow the social taxes paid today to be paid to those who receive a pension today.
Helme also said that the 2022 budget included a EUR 600 million deficit. He sees the bulk of the cuts planned in the budget Bill as deceitful i.e. virtual, whereby an amount is moved from one budget item of a ministry to another budget item, keeping it at the same level or even increasing it.
Indrek Saar (Social Democratic Party) called next year’s state budget a feat of prestidigitation. He pointed out that on the one hand the Minister of Finance is talking about cuts and calls to save money, yet on the other hand additional millions are distributed here and there, although the sources for funds to cover those millions are not known.
Saar explained that due to rapid economic growth, the deficit in Estonia’s state budget next year would be reduced by EUR 400 million, yet the plan to cut EUR 50 million in the spring is still standing. Saar sees the opportunities for children’s hobby education reducing instead of expanding because EUR 4 million would still be erased from this item, albeit instead of the EUR 7 million planned this spring. The pay rise for teachers is clearly insufficient in a situation where there is an ongoing salary race in Estonia and the average salary will increase by twice that much during the same period.
Mart Võrklaev (Reform Party) listed the priorities of his party. The 13.1 billion revenue and 13.6 billion expenditure in the state budget is something that we must first and foremost thank the Estonian people and businesses for, because they have restarted our economy. He added that the government’s decisions have played their part, because a decision was made not to keep empty cuts in the budget.
Võrklaev also stressed the efforts of the government in ensuring a worthy pay to frontline health care workers, police officers and teachers, but also to other state employees for their valuable work. He also referred to the defence expenditure, building the external border of Estonia, and transition to Estonian medium education. Võrklaev affirmed that the government had made a fundamental decision and that the funds freed with the disintegration of the second pillar would not be taken out of the pension system.
Erki Savisaar (Centre Party) did not agree with the criticism of the opposition. He named pension increase as a priority. Next year, pensioners can count on the average increase of EUR 342, and a two to three times higher increase can be expected in 2023 as well. Support for pensioners living alone will increase from EUR 115 to 200 next year.
Savisaar highlighted transport related expenses in the budget Bill. EUR 400 million is planned over the next four years to support public transport. Several regional plans will also receive funding, such as a permanent connection in the Suur Väin Strait, Tallinn orbital railway, or thematic plan for mineral resources in Harju County. Road construction and maintenance work will also continue, e.g. reconstructing the Võõbu-Mäe stretch as a four-lane road, the Kose-Mäo stretch, continuing to build the multi-level crossing of Riia Road in Tartu, and constructing the new four-lane Pärnu-Uulu stretch. We can also expect the electrification of the existing railways and the completion of six additional electric trains, as well as the ongoing design and construction work of Rail Baltic.
At the deliberation of the matter of significant national importance “How to achieve a restriction-free Estonia?” initiated by the Estonian Centre Party Faction, reports were given by Minister of Health and Labour Tanel Kiik, North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation Medical Director and member of the COVID-19 Scientific Advisory Board Peep Talving, Professor of the Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine of the University of Tartu and Head of COVID-19 Scientific Advisory Board Irja Lutsar, and Member of the Riigikogu Andrei Korobeinik.
Minister Kiik gave a summary of the infection indicators and correlated the increased number of vaccinations with the reduced hospitalisations. He explained that the main objective of vaccination is to safeguard lives and health, not reduce infections.
Kiik sees it positive that vaccination rates are higher among the older population groups. Among the adults across the country, about 67 percent have received one shot; in the 60+ age group, this indicator is nearly 73%. The highest vaccination rates are among the 70–79 year old age group, where nearly 77% have received at least one shot. He feels that more work needs to be done with the 80+ age group, where two out of three are vaccinated. Around one half of the 12–17 year old age group is vaccinated.
According to Kiik, about 70% of Estonia’s population has achieved a certain protection by now. As far as opening up the society is concerned, Kiik sees a need to make stronger efforts. “We are on the home stretch, so increasing vaccination rates by just a few percentages would give us the option to gradually start alleviating the control rules, the restrictions and measures that we have in place today, and then we can all contribute towards encouraging people who are still on the fence or who have still not had time to get vaccinated to do this at the first opportunity,” the Minister concluded his presentation.
Professor Talving outlined the COVID-19 disease and its general progression, spoke about the tolerance limits of the hospitals and how much the planned treatments have suffered as a consequence.
The most difficult moment in hospitals was early April 2020. As an example, the North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation had two intensive care wards reserved exclusively for COVID treatment. A traffic lights system has now been put in place to classify the tolerance levels of hospitals. Planned treatments can already be limited if the light is amber, and as the infection numbers progress, so will planned treatments also be gradually restricted.
According to Talving’s estimation, 21,642 people – our neighbours, friends, parents, family members – have not received their planned treatment. Looking into the future, it is clear that access to vaccination must be made easy, otherwise we would again need to start limiting planned treatments.
In conclusion, Talving expects the burden to hospitals to be a little lower than during the second wave, however the third wave will last longer. He stressed that even without restrictions, the hospital network must ensure emergency medical care in Estonia.
“Planned treatment will be guaranteed 100 percent if we have up to 150 patients in the general ward, and 100 percent if we have up to 20 patients in intensive care,” Talving explained. “The successive waves accumulate a deficit. And vaccination is key. Our neighbours, families, relatives – everyone will lose in treatment capability if we do not get vaccinated in larger numbers.”
Professor Lutsar said that as of the previous week, 223 million COVID cases had been registered around the world, and 4.6 million had died. In Estonia, COVID mortality is relatively low, around the one percent level.
Lutsar sees COVID clearly as an illness of the elderly, and particularly elderly men. A man who is over 80 and is hospitalised is more than two times likely to die compared to a woman his age.
Lutsar also explained that the presence of antibodies and immunity are not exactly one and the same thing. She said that for the delta strain, it is not possible to achieve herd immunity with the current vaccines. We need to talk about individual immunity, the presence of antibodies, and the need for everyone to take care of themselves. Professor also added that recovery from the infection gives an excellent immunity.
Lutsar concluded that a restriction free life means the ability to live together with the virus. She advised to accept the virus. “If we can prevent the difficult cases, both sides should actually be happy. The virus is not actually interested in destroying us because that would end up destroying it, and this is certainly something that it does not want,” Lutsar explained.
The Professor said that the capability of the medical system is the decisive factor. She believes that the elderly care system should prevent the spreading of the virus instead of favouring it. “Let’s do everything in our power to stop the virus from spreading uncontrollably: let’s get vaccinated and accept that the masks are not going anywhere,” was Lutsar’s advice. “And let’s make decisions based on science, not emotions.”
MP Korobeinik summarised the discussion by saying that the main and actually the only way out of the restrictions is vaccination, particularly among the elderly, because it is the elderly unvaccinated patients who are causing the hospital crisis.
He recommends concentrating on positive solutions instead of applying pressure. First off, we need to acknowledge honestly that there are already such low numbers of unvaccinated people that we would be able to approach them individually. He proposed establishing a vaccine emergency unit that could be ordered to your home as easily as an online order from the grocery store.
Another potential solution would be additional remuneration, i.e. 13th salary to vaccinated staff of care homes, e.g. at the end of this year, and also to those who have already been vaccinated earlier. He has calculated that this would take about three million euros. Korobeinik admitted that the state awarding people for vaccinating may sound silly but that this would save lives and not only the lives of the elderly clients, but also the lives of the people who would not consequently be left without medical assistance.
Korobeinik stressed the need to understand that the stigmatisation of the unvaccinated would lead to more harm than good, and could very easily get out of hand. “Not only does it drive a wedge in the society, it also turns someone who is on the fence into an active anti-vaxxer,” he said. “If you are attacked you will inevitably get defensive. A counter-attack with the vaccine does not increase the vaccination rate, but can instead lower it.”
Korobeinik is convinced that now is the time to establish an Estonian vaccine injuries foundation, which already exists in countries like Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, which are already doing away with the restrictions, but also in Canada, Germany, Italy, New Zealand, and many other countries.
Korobeinik explained that if vaccination leads to negative health effects, the individual or their family would receive payments from the foundation. He admitted that money does not bring anyone back from the dead, but neither do insurance policies; however, the vaccine injuries foundation would enhance the sense of justice in the society and reduce polarisation. He considered the expense of the establishment of the foundation as marginal.
Korobeinik expressed hope that we would be able to overcome our differences of opinion in the near future and take the necessary steps to come out of the corona crisis and its restrictions in only a couple of months, and that in future we would be able to cope even better as a country in similar situations.
During the debate, Urmas Reinsalu (Isamaa), Peeter Ernits (Estonian Conservative People’s Party), Margit Sutrop (Reform Party), and Jevgeni Ossinovski (Social Democratic Party) took the floor.
The general assembly of the Estonian session of the Model European Parliament is held today in the Riigikogu (Parliament of Estonia). It was opened by President of the Riigikogu Jüri Ratas, who spoke to the young people about the role, importance and responsibility of decision-makers.
Ratas told the members of the Model European Parliament that on 20 August, the 30th anniversary of the restoration of independence of Estonia had been celebrated in the Session Hall of the Riigikogu. In his opinion, it is symbolic that the young people are holding their session in the same place to discuss the issues of the future of the European Union. “For as long as you have lived, Estonia has been a member of the European Union, and this has been a successful time in every sense,” Ratas said. “It has been a time of peace, a time of movement without borders, an opportunity for learning, for economic growth, for strengthening cultural connections.”
“You are the decision-makers of the future, you have very big role,” Ratas emphasised. “Your responsibility is growing day by day, and I mean your responsibility not only for your municipality or city and Estonia, but also in Europe. This is not just responsibility for Tallinn and Estonia, but it is responsibility towards 500 million people.”
The President of the Riigikogu underlined that the young people of today would soon have to decide what would become of internal combustion engines, what would become of energy, what would become of East-Virumaa. Besides topics connected with climate and the green transition, there are issues relating to security and the future of the European Union.
“Will you allow to set up wind turbines on the territory of your municipality, or what should the relations between the European Union and Russia be like? It is a very serious and necessary discussion,” Ratas described the challenges faced by the young people. “These are serious and important questions. I wish you a lot of strength for that, and readiness to make compromises, and success!” With these words, Ratas opened today’s session of Model Europe.
Ratas pointed out that, in decision-making, it was important to proceed from the values the European Union was based on, like freedom, democracy, the rule of law, cooperation and solidarity.
After a break of one year due to the pandemic, the European Parliament simulation for school students, which has been organised since 2003, is again taking place today at the Riigikogu. The topics of discussion of the 16th Estonian Model European Parliament are very diverse, ranging from the green transition to football. Some of the young people participating in the session will become members of the Estonian delegations to the Model European Parliament Baltic Sea Region and the international session of the Model European Parliament.
Exercise Decisive Lancer got underway today in Estonia, emphasizing and putting to the test the procedures and activities of the EDL Regional Commands in preparing, coordinating and conducting defensive operations in Estonia.
“In last year’s exercise, we focused on activities taking place after a military conflict has emerged. This year our main effort is on the time period and activities preceding a full scale conflict – practicing comprehensive national defence in cooperation with other national authorities, focusing on the preparation of military defence,” said colonel Mati Tikerpuu, chief of Exercise Control.
Estonian Defence League’s Regional Commands’ command posts, Estonian Defence Forces units, allied units in Estonia and different Estonian national authorities are participating in the exercise, involving close to 300 people.
“These exercises prepare us to act properly during a possible crisis situation. If the commanders and command posts have trained for possible crisis- and wartime scenarios, then the decisions in the real situation will be faster, use of resources will be better, more lives will be spared and more losses will be inflicted upon the adversary,” said colonel Tikerpuu.
EDL Regional Commands’ command posts play a key role in coordinating the activities of different national authorities on a local level. The units were for the first time the main training audience on a similar command post exercise last year, on exercise Decisive Lancer 2020.
The Act that was passed in the Riigikogu today aims to increase competition in the reverse auctions for generation of electricity from renewable energy sources, to reduce the use of fossil fuels in electricity generation and to improve the supply security of electricity generation in Estonia.
Under the current regulation, the reverse auctions organised for the attainment of the national renewable energy objective are open only to generating installations that have not generated electricity before the reverse auction. According to the Act on Amendments to the Electricity Market Act (156 SE), initiated by the Government, in the future, existing producers will also be allowed to participate in such reverse auctions, in order to motivate such producers to use renewable energy sources instead of fossil fuels as input for electricity generation in the future. In such a case, the winner of the reverse auction can be paid support for each reverse auction during up to two years starting from commencement of the generation of electricity from the renewable source related to the reverse auction.
A securities system is also introduced to the regulation of reverse auctions, in order to ensure more efficiently that the winners of reverse auctions implement the activities they commit to undertake.
During the debate, Jevgeni Ossinovski (Social Democratic Party), Sven Sester (Isamaa) and Kalle Grünthal (Estonian Conservative People’s Party) took the floor.
69 members of the Riigikogu were in favour of passing of the Act, nine voted against, and there was one abstention,
The Riigikogu passed another Act
The Act on Amendments to the Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions Act, the Identity Documents Act and the State Fees Act (376 SE), initiated by the Government, provides for a clear division of competence and responsibility between agencies regarding electronic identification in the Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions Act and the Identity Documents Act.
The Act updates the regulation concerning the assessment of the assurance level of private-law electronic identification schemes. At the same time, the State Fees Act is amended by providing for a state fee applied for reviewing an application to assess the assurance level of a private-law electronic identification scheme in the chapter concerning the acts of the Information System Authority.
In the course of the resolution of the security flaw with ID-cards that appeared in Estonia in autumn 2017, the need to organise the legal space concerning identity documents, electronic identification and trust services as well as the division of work and responsibility between the state agencies responsible for these areas rose.
The Act also amends the Identity Documents Act, among other things, incorporating the amendments to implement the Regulation (EU) 2019/1157 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
76 members of the Riigikogu were in favour of passing the Act.
A Bill passed the second reading
The Bill on Amendments to the Product Conformity Act and Amendments to Other Associated Acts (372 SE), initiated by the Government, will extend the surveillance competences of market surveillance authorities in connection with products offered for sale in e-commerce. Authorities will get access to communication data in order that they would have the opportunity to identify owners of webpages and, where necessary, to restrict access to online interfaces and to require the removal of information content or the display of a warning. The aim of the amendment is to ensure that dangerous products are removed from sale as quickly as possible.
The supervision of products from third countries will also be enhanced. For this, a new requirement for making construction products, personal protective equipment, appliances burning gaseous fuels, and toys available on the European Union market will be introduced. In the case of such products, there will have to be an interlocutor established in the European Union mandated by the manufacturer who can be addressed in the event of additional questions or problems and who is responsible for the availability and verification of declarations and, where necessary, for taking corrective action.
In cross-border cooperation, digital operation and information exchange will be introduced between European Union surveillance authorities. The competence of market surveillance authorities in respect of personal transporters used in traffic and unmanned aircraft system (UAS) intended to be operated in the ‘open’ category will be specified. According to the amendments, the Consumer Protection and Technical Regulatory Authority, and not the Transport Administration, will carry out market surveillance of such appliances. For the purpose of more effective sanctioning, the amount of the fine for legal persons will be increased from 3200 euro to 32,000 euro.
Five Bills passed the first reading
The Bill on Amendments to the Traffic Act (414 SE), initiated by the Government, will transpose into Estonian law the European Union directive that provides for making the payment of road fees within the European Union more convenient. At the same time, a regulation for cross-border information exchange for cases of failure to pay a road fee will be established.
Regardless of the fact that, in Estonia, road toll is not collected through automated identification, the directive needs to be transposed to the minimum mandatory extent, that is, in respect of the provisions concerning the right of European Electronic Toll Service (EETS) providers to register their activities in every EU Member State. Therefore, every Member State must provide, in accordance with the directive, for the requirements for the technology and equipment used, and set out the rights and obligations of both service providers and users.
The Bill on Amendments to the Energy Sector Organisation Act and Amendments to Other Associated Acts (382 SE), initiated by the Government, will transpose the European Union Renewable Energy Directive, which aims to increase the production and consumption of renewable energy both in households and at the level of large producers and consumers.
The amendments made with the transposition of the Renewable Energy Directive can be divided into three groups according to their content and scope: the national renewable energy targets and the principles for the calculation thereof together with the issues of guarantees of origin; the boosting and facilitation of the consumption of renewable-source energy generated for own use, which includes spatial plans and administrative and authorisation procedures; and the sustainability criteria for biofuels.
During the debate, Kalvi Kõva (Social Democratic Party) and Heiki Hepner (Isamaa) took the floor.
The Bill on the Approval of the Amendments to the Convention concerning International Carriage by Rail and to its Appendices (386 SE), initiated by the Government. The Convention concerning International Carriage by Rail COTIF is a uniform system of legal provisions concerning international carriage of passengers, luggage and goods by rail. The uniform rules of COTIF are applied in international rail transport, but also in road and water transport, which are related thereto.
As at 1 December 2020, OTIF includes 50 Member States in Europe, North Africa and Central Asia, as well as Jordan, and the European Union as an organisation. All EU Member States are members of the organisation, except for Cyprus and Malta, as these countries have no railways. The uniform rules on the carriage of passengers and goods (CIV and CIM) contained in the appendices to the Convention are applied on railways to the extent of more than 250,000 km.
During the debate, Kalle Grünthal (Estonian Conservative People’s Party) took the floor.
According to the Bill on Amendments to the Building Code (395 SE), initiated by the Government, the Building Code will be amended in connection with the transposition into Estonian law of the European Union directive on road infrastructure safety management. Insofar as the scope of regulation of the directive was expanded, the road safety measures provided for by the directive will have to be implemented on all primary roads as well as public-use roads constructed with EU funds, in addition to roads of the trans-European transport network (TEN-T).
On the basis of the directive, the competent authority, mostly the Transport Administration, will have to assess road safety impacts, carry out road safety audits, assess road safety on the road network, and undertake periodic checks on the safety of roads. When local governments construct roads with the involvement of EU funds in the future, the obligations of the competent authority will also have to be performed on roads constructed by them with EU funds, in addition to the current TEN-T roads.
The Bill on Amendments to the Planning Act and Amendments to Other Associated Acts (378 SE), initiated by the Government, provides for the establishment of a central database of spatial plans. The purpose of the Bill is to update the whole planning procedure and to economise on resources.
With a central database of spatial plans, it will be possible to store and disclose information on spatial plans in force, the annexes thereto, and the decisions made in the course of planning procedures.
The Bill will bring the provisions on planning proceedings into conformity with the Administrative Procedure Act according to which it is also possible to deliver documents and send notices electronically in planning proceedings. At present, the authorities arranging the preparation of spatial plans send notices and documents in planning proceedings only by registered mail.
The Bill also provides for the possibility to hold public discussions online. According to the Bill, in the future, notices to persons involved in planning proceedings can also be sent through apartment associations.
The Riigikogu received an overview of a draft development plan
Minister for Economy and Infrastructure Taavi Aas presented the draft of the Transport and Mobility Development Plan 2021–2035.
The development plan is projected for 15 years, as many changes that are taking place in the sector, such as the construction of Rail Baltic and the consideration of the construction of Tallinna-Helsinki tunnel, are long-term processes the results of which will be seen over the longer term. The main focus of the development plan is to reduce the environmental footprint of the means and system of transport in order to contribute to achieving the climate goals by both 2030 and 2050.
According to the development plan, with a view to improving mobility, the state wishes to make using public transport more convenient, quicker and more accessible to people by organising and planning it better, and making more use of the opportunities of digitalisation. It is also planned to pay more attention to movement by bicycle and on foot.
The development plan is in conformity with the national development strategy “Estonia 2035”.
During the debate, Kersti Sarapuu (Centre Party), Sven Sester (Isamaa), Raimond Kaljulaid, Heiki Hepner (Isamaa), Jüri Jaanson (Reform Party), Heljo Pikhof (Social Democratic Party) and Henn Põlluaas (Estonian Conservative People’s Party) took the floor.
Two Bills were rejected at the first reading
The Bill on Amendments to the Citizenship Act (388 SE), initiated by the Faction Isamaa, was intended to preclude the grant and restoration of Estonian citizenship to persons who have been repeatedly punished under criminal law for intentional crimes.
During the debate, Helir-Valdor Seeder (Isamaa) took the floor.
The lead committee moved to reject the Bill at the first reading; 43 members of the Riigikogu were in favour of the motion and 23 voted against.
The Bill on Amendments to the Tobacco Act (412 SE), initiated by members of the Riigikogu Tarmo Kruusimäe, Raivo Tamm, Üllar Saaremäe, Madis Milling, Kert Kingo, Kalle Grünthal, Andres Metsoja and Paul Puustusmaa, was intended to set out a regulation for tobacco-free snus, which has so far not been regulated in detail, in order to thereby ensure the safety of the product. It was also intended to correct the provisions that, contrary to the objective set, have brought about an increase in smuggling and health risks.
During the debate, Tarmo Kruusimäe (Isamaa) and Kalle Grünthal (Estonian Conservative People’s Party) took the floor.
The lead committee moved to reject the Bill at the first reading; 33 members of the Riigikogu were in favour of the motion and 18 voted against.
Today the Riigikogu discussed the impact of the rise in the CO2 price on the state budget and economy as a matter of significant national importance, initiated by the State Budget Control Select Committee.
Chairman of the State Budget Control Select Committee Urmas Reinsalu, Minister for Economy and Infrastructure Taavi Aas and Member of the Management Board of Baltic Energy Partners Marko Allikson made reports.
In his report, Reinsalu noted that the current forecasts on the formation of the electricity price had proved inaccurate and they were jeopardising all Estonian residential customers and businesses and consequently the competitiveness of our whole economy and the livelihoods of people.
Reinsalu pointed out that businesses and consumers were paying a higher electricity price in connection with a rise in the CO2 trading price and, in reality, the money was all being accrued to the state budget. “When the burden increases for customers, this does not mean at all that the money accrued to the state budget will actually return to the consumers,” Reinsalu said. He added that the rise in the electricity price was projected to cost at least 250 million euro to Estonian consumers this year.
In Reinsalu’s words, the state needs a clear and dispassionate analysis of the impact of both emissions trading and climate policy, and of the cost of these for Estonian consumers. “In the conditions of the drastically increased energy deficit we need a clear and dispassionate analysis of what our national electricity supply security will be like,” Reinsalu said. He recalled that, at the beginning of the coronavirus crisis, when countries had closed their borders, the countries had each stood for their own residents. “There is no doubt at all about the stock exchange conditions either. If a soaring deficit arises, countries will begin to make dispassionate decisions, choosing to ensure supply security for their own population, for the consumers in their country.”
Reinsalu also pointed out that, besides the supply security of electricity generation, a clear position was needed on what Europe’s current emissions trading dynamics meant in terms of electricity consumers.
Reinsalu pointed out the options for the Government to operate in the regulative market. He mentioned the renewable energy charge paid by consumers. “We have the opportunity to fully cancel the renewable energy charge and to compensate it to renewable energy producers with a corresponding state budget appropriation, like many European countries are doing,” Reinsalu suggested.
He noted secondly that it was necessary to review the ensuring of energy supply security and the decision to close down oil shale energy in Estonia. “We must also urgently increase the payments from KredEx, and simplify the support mechanisms to increase the energy efficiency of the housing stock, including private houses, and to promote local energy generation,” Reinsalu said.
In Reinsalu’s opinion, the electricity market is a politically distorted market but, in his words, the state must use mechanisms to prevent the price from skyrocketing for the consumer. In his words, the money the state accrues from the value added tax and the CO2 units must be used to develop an automated stabiliser as several European countries have started to do without delay.
Minister Aas explained the reasons for the rise in the electricity price. He noted that the price was formed by the fossil fuel power stations across Europe. Their price depends on the CO2 quota and the world market price of fuel.
The minister explained that this summer had been exceptionally hot not only in Estonia but in Scandinavia as well. The low rainfall meant that the amount of the water collected behind the dam of the hydroelectric power station in Norway was smaller than usual. Therefore, in the minister’s words, electricity power stations using fossil fuels need to be kept in operation. At the same time, the economy is undergoing a rapid recovery not only here in Europe but also in Asia and North America. The recovery has created an exceptionally high energy demand, and this in turn has given a push to the world market prices of fossil energy carriers.
Aas said that the Government did not have a lever to increase rainfall in Norway or to generate wind that would increase the production in European wind farms. Nor is it in the Government’s power to meaningfully influence the price of fossil fuels that is formed in the global market. “In the formation of the price of electricity, the CO2 emissions trading system and the measures to bring renewable energy to the market sooner are the only components dependent on the European Union energy and climate policy,” Aas said. He added that the Government had taken steps in both directions, but neither of them was a quick solution or a magic wand. However, they will help avoid such problems in the future.
Aas emphasised that the price pressure was caused by the high price of fuel, in particular the price of natural gas. “Once the price of natural gas begins to fall or the amount of rainfall normalises to what it has been on the average over the last ten years, the market price for electricity will fall as well,” Aas said. In his words, renewable energy is the long-term solution to avoid a price-shock, and this transition is being attended to on a daily basis.
Aas recalled that an amendment to the Electricity Market Act, Bill 156 SE, was in the legislative process of the Riigikogu that would create wider opportunities to replace the expensive fossil fuels with CO2-free waste wood in Narva power stations. Likewise, at the beginning of next year, the spatial plan for the Estonian maritime areas will enter its final stage and it will be possible to begin to launch the development of wind farms in the sea.
In Aas’s words, the previous Estonian Government has been proven to have made the right decision to maintain and to have available at any time at least 1000 MW of managed production capacity in Estonia. He admitted that there were periods when that capacity was not needed, but the current year was showing clearly that there were periods when we could not manage with just renewable power plants dependent on the weather.
In his report, entrepreneur Allikson spoke of the market price of electricity. Allikson explained how the electricity markets functioned. He pointed out that the price on the stock exchange was determined by the marginal producer, that is, the last electric power plant that made it to the market, on the basis of its variable costs. About 20 per cent of the electricity production in Europe is based on natural gas. “When the prices rise to around 100–160 euro in the spot market, then this is the level with which it is possible to produce electricity in a gas power station today,” Allikson said. In his words, this contains the CO2 cost, this contains the cost of fuel, and this contains the operating costs. If the price skyrockets, gas plants are the ones that determine the price.
He also pointed out that, in the Baltic states, there were particular additional reasons that had influenced the upward movement of the price. First he mentioned that supplies on the Russian-Belarusian borders would be reduced from November 2021 because Lithuania had not wished to buy nuclear energy from Astravyets. Second, our price is also affected by the fact that our connections with Latvia are larger than before. “In fact, Latvia and Lithuania have always been in a slightly higher price region and therefore the prices are converging. We are no longer in the same price range as Finland; our prices are slightly higher,” Allikson said. He admitted that Finland had been doing the right things looking into the future. “Next year, they will be launching a new nuclear power station, and significant new wind capacities will be added. So Finland will probably remain a region with a lower price also in the future.”
In his report, Allikson also touched on the longer-term projection. “Everything that rises in terms of price will probably fall eventually,” he said. He explained that, in the long-term perspective, it was presumed that more power links would be opened in the Nordic countries, prices would converge between different regions and, in the long term, the price level would be expected to remain low.
Allison noted that Estonia was not producing enough electricity – consumption was exceeding 1000 MW, while production remained at around above 900 MW. “This means that we have a shortage of electricity and we always need to buy electricity,” he stated. “If the electricity we buy has a higher price, then our price is higher, regardless of the price at which Narva Power Plants wish to sell.”
In Allikson’s words, it is impossible to separate the CO2 trading system and the electricity market. “It cannot be said that we kind of are in the CO2 market and remain outside the electricity market, or vice versa,” he pointed out the inevitability. He also thinks that it is not reasonable to change the current subsidies to renewable energy. “Because while Estonia needs renewable energy investments, this will not make Estonia more attractive to investors, but rather less attractive. After all, more investments are needed and not less investments,” he explained.
Allikson pointed out what the Riigikogu could do to influence the price of electricity. In his words, politicians can influence the administrative component of the price of electricity. “You can use the higher CO2 auction revenues to compensate either the components of the electricity bill or a price increase, and the excise duty and value added tax can always be lowered,” he said.
In other aspects, the price of electricity is affected by weather. In Allikson’s words, a reduction in gas consumption might help reduce gas prices. In a longer-term perspective, however, in his words, new connections such as Estlink 3 will be needed. He also mentioned the speeding up of the renewable energy development, the development of storage technologies, energy efficiency, the flexibility of consumption, and the ascertaining of the possibilities of nuclear energy and hydrogen.
During the debate, Helir-Valdor Seeder (Isamaa), Dmitri Dmitrijev (Centre Party), Jevgeni Ossinovski (Social Democratic Party), Kristen Michal (Reform Party) and Henn Põlluaas (Estonian Conservative People’s Party) took the floor on behalf of their factions. Jürgen Ligi (Reform Party), Martin Helme (Estonian Conservative People’s Party), Peeter Ernits (Estonian Conservative People’s Party), Mart Helme (Estonian Conservative People’s Party and Tarmo Kruusimäe (Isamaa) also took the floor.
The main purpose of the Bill (409 SE) is to increase the availability and re-usability of open data to promote innovation and economy, the smooth functioning of the internal market and the promotion of the information society.
The amendments to the Bill will enforce the requirements for open data and the re-use of public sector information arising from a relevant EU directive. Another purpose of the Bill is to solve the practical shortcomings that have arisen upon the interpretation of the definition of open data and the principles relating to re-use provided for in the current Act.
The explanatory memorandum notes that public sector information has been gaining increasingly more importance and new meaning over the last nearly twenty years. As a result of the development of the data and platform economy, it has been realised that such information should be re-used as much as possible. At the European level, this awareness led to the adoption of the directive on the re-use of public sector information (PSI directive) in 2003. It aimed to create favourable conditions for the development of the internal market. It was understood that public sector information is an important primary material for digital content products and services and will become an even more important content resource with the development of information technology opportunities.
The wider re-usability of public information enabled European businesses, among other things, to make use of the potential of the information, and supported economic growth and the creation of jobs.
During the debate, Heiki Hepner (Isamaa), Kalle Grünthal (Estonian Conservative People’s Party) and the Minister of Justice Maris Lauri took the floor.
The Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu “Approval of the Principles for the Implementation of the European Union Cohesion Policy Funds for 2021–2027 to Reduce Regional Inequalities” (390 OE), submitted by the Social Democratic Party Faction, was rejected at the first reading. It had been intended to speed up the growth of the regions with slower growth rates in order to stop the increase in regional inequalities.
During the debate, Eduard Odinets (Social Democratic Party) and Heiki Hepner (Isamaa) took the floor.
The lead committee moved to reject the draft Resolution at the first reading. The result of voting: 44 votes in favour and 24 against. The draft Resolution was dropped from the legislative proceedings.
During the open microphone, Kalle Grünthal and Peeter Ernits took the floor.
The meetings of First Vice-President of the European Parliament Roberta Metsola with Vice-President of the Riigikogu (Parliament of Estonia) Hanno Pevkur, Deputy Chair of the European Union Affairs Committee of the Riigikogu Riina Sikkut and other members of the Riigikogu focused on the issues relating to Belarus, the development of Europe, the green transition, and remote working of the parliament.
Vice-President of the Riigikogu Hanno Pevkur and Roberta Metsola spoke about digitalisation and the work of the Riigikogu in the COVID-19 crisis. Pevkur underlined that the whole Riigikogu was able to work via the video bridge, but presently there was no need for it, as most of the MPs were vaccinated. “Working online is still an excellent solution for crisis situation, and it is good to have a readiness for teleworking when necessary,” Pevkur said.
The hybrid attack by Belarus and migration issues were also discussed at the meeting. Pevkur emphasised that we had to defend all our borders, and to invest in land borders as well. He underlined that the problem did not concern only the Estonian border construction, but also defending of all external borders of the European Union and NATO. Speaking of the situation on the Belarusian border, Pevkur pointed out that Lithuania’s burden was the greatest, but Estonia was also trying to contribute by sending our people and equipment to help them.
The hybrid attack by Belarus, the situation in Poland and Lithuania as well as the events in Afghanistan were also discussed at Metsola’s meeting with Deputy Chair of the European Union Affairs Committee of the Riigikogu Riina Sikkut, Chairman of the National Defence Committee of the Riigikogu Enn Eesmaa and Deputy Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Riigikogu Mihhail Lotman. Besides that, the Conference on the Future of Europe was spoken of.
Sikkut underlined that the Conference on the Future of Europe should not be overshadowed by other current topics. She pointed out that the Conference should focus attention to issues that are important for citizens. “First, we have to understand what issues citizens want to be solved,” Sikkut said. “The Conference on the Future largely relies on the ideas of citizens and their active involvement.”
Issues relating to the achievement of the climate targets of the European Union were discussed at the meeting with Deputy Chair of the European Union Affairs Committee of the Riigikogu Riina Sikkut, members of the European Union Affairs Committee of the Riigikogu Urve Tiidus and Timo Suslov and member of the Economic Affairs Committee of the Riigikogu Annely Akkermann.
It was admitted that the targets for a greener Europe were very diverse, and the situations and the problems that needed solution varied greatly by countries. Sikkut said that it was important to explain to everybody what needed to be done to achieve the targets, for example, in agriculture. “In this regard, it is important to bear in mind that, by recycling materials, we make our own lives better – we are not doing this for anybody else.”
It was agreed that the European Parliament considered it important that the Member States gave as detailed information as possible and gave specific examples in order to identify the points of concern for green topics, because only then would it be possible to address the problems in depth and to resolve them. The price of energy, power connections and green fuels were also discussed at the meetings.
Today, First Vice-President of the European Parliament Roberta Metsola is on a visit to Estonia. She will meet with Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, Vice-President of the Riigikogu (Parliament of Estonia) Hanno Pevkur, Deputy Chair of the European Union Affairs Committee of the Riigikogu Riina Sikkut and other members of the Riigikogu.
At the meeting with Vice-President of the Riigikogu Hanno Pevkur, it is planned to speak about the work of the parliament in the COVID-19 crisis as well as the state of the rule of law in Poland and Hungary.
In the Riigikogu, Metsola will also meet with Deputy Chair of the European Union Affairs Committee Riina Sikkut, Chairman of the National Defence Committee Enn Eesmaa and Deputy Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee Mihhail Lotman. The discussions at the meeting will focus particularly on the issues relating to the Conference on the Future of Europe, the Belarusian hybrid attack and illegal migration.
Metsola will also have a meeting with Deputy Chair of the European Union Affairs Committee Riina Sikkut, members of the European Union Affairs Committee Urve Tiidus and Timo Suslov, Chair of the Environment Committee of the Riigikogu Yoko Alender and member of the Economic Affairs Committee of the Riigikogu Annely Akkerman to discuss the European Union’s climate policy package “Fit for 55”.
The Vice-President of the European Parliament will also meet with Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, Undersecretary for European Affairs at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Märt Volmer and Director of the Estonian Centre for International Development Kadri Maasik. She will visit the Experience Europe Centre and have a video discussion with students on the future of Europe and migration.
Before leaving Estonia, Metsola will have a meeting with Director of the NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence Colonel Jaak Tarien and Chief of Staff of the NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence Lieutenant Colonel Bernard Hoffman.
At today’s sitting, the Chancellor of Justice Ülle Madise gave the Riigikogu an overview of her activities in 2020–2021. She acknowledged the Riigikogu for the legislative amendments that had helped solve people’s problems.
At the beginning of her report, Ülle Madise pointed out that, over the year, the Chancellor of Justice had received a total of over 5000 appeals, complaints and petitions of various kind, over 3000 of which had needed a substantial solution. In the words of the Chancellor of Justice, the amount of her work had increased by one fifth over the year, and in six years, the amount of work has actually doubled. “As always, wherever we can, we try to help the fellow citizens who entrust their worries to us, and we use the shortest legitimate way for this,” Madise confirmed. She added that cooperation had been key to solving the problems of the people and avoiding situations where people feel that their country does not care for them.
In Madise’s words, it was necessary to have the common goal to make Estonia the best place to live. At the same time, this means that life must always be in line with the Constitution that stipulates our freedom, responsibility and good sense, and even one person who gets caught in the middle is one too many.
Madise thanked the Riigikogu for making amendments to the legislative provisions that had been source of unfair treatment of people. She mentioned as examples that psychiatric care had become available to young people, safety in schoolchildren’s tour buses had improved, and victims of misdemeanours had been given more rights.
As a new phenomenon, the Chancellor of Justice had noticed duties and fees imposed subjectively. She gave the example that, in return for the adoption of a detailed spatial plan, in some rural municipalities, a certain amount must be paid as a social infrastructure fee to the local budget, or as a fee to the local community for tolerating a factory. “This may be totally justified in itself,” Madise said. “However, this is where the Riigikogu should create the possibility to pay a relevant local tax or duty.”
Madise said that requesting legality was not pointless nit-picking. “Only the rule of law creates the preconditions for us having a healthy and reliable economic environment, and in the same way it creates a precondition for people feeling secure,” the Chancellor of Justice said. In her words, systemic errors had been successfully corrected in a number of cases. As an example, she mentioned a guideline on the opening of packages in customs.
Madise noted that the Chancellor of Justice was also in charge of supervising and promoting the respect for the rights of disabled people. In her words, all buildings and the public space should be safe and accessible to everyone who has difficulties to move around, and in her opinion, there are indeed positive developments in this sphere. For example, the new procurements for buses are made to procure low-floor buses. People with a hearing loss can benefit from the subtitle software developed at Tallinn University of Technology, which quickly converts speech into subtitles, and the first audio described film has been released, keeping in mind people with a visual impairment. At the same time, on the negative side, the visually impaired had been forgotten again when the registration for vaccination had begun.
In Madise’s words, the work of the Chancellor of Justice also includes inspection visits to psychiatric hospitals, prisons and care homes. The situation has been improving step by step over the years, but many things are still amiss. She pointed out the problems such as the shortage of staff in care homes, the very low salary level, and the lack of required training.
Madise said that prisons were continuing the unacceptable practice where children who came to visit their parents were being stripped for searching, which was a blatant violation of international principles, a violation of the Estonian Constitution, and totally unacceptable.
Madise recalled that, in the previous year, she had often had to explain that, even in times of the greatest crisis, the Chancellor of Justice must be guided by the Constitution and laws. “Even in time of pandemic, according to our Constitution, restrictions and deprivation of liberty must be justified, and not the other way round,” Madise said. In her words, simple solutions tend to come to mind quickly particularly in time of pandemic, and particularly in such times people tend to demand “an iron hand” and violation of the fundamental rights.
“The legal science is not and must not be formal study of the provisions,” Madise said. “When assessing the constitutionality of the restrictions of fundamental rights, it is always necessary first to establish the facts, to ascertain the circumstances of life, to study the research results of various spheres, and to involve experts in other fields. And then logical argumentation will lead to an assessment on the constitutionality of one or the other decision.”
Madise emphasised that, according to the Constitution, the Riigikogu runs the country. Unfortunately, the Chancellor of Justice is seeing in her work that the framework in which the businesses should operate under the conditions of free competition is provided not so much by Acts as by regulations of ministers, or guidelines, which does not guarantee a good economic environment. “This would be unconstitutional in any case, because, according to the Estonian Constitution, the Riigikogu must decide all significant issues,” the Chancellor of Justice said. “I have noticed on several occasions that undertakings would also like the provisions defining the conditions of competition to be omitted from Acts. Possibly with very good intentions, but there may be a tinge of lobbyism behind this as well.”
In Madise’s words, decisions that have a national impact, concern all people and restrict fundamental rights must be made by the Riigikogu. “This ensures that a public debate is held and the life experience of the 101 members of the Riigikogu is reflected in the decision that is made, and that there is constitutional review,” she said.
To conclude her report, the Chancellor of Justice spoke of the rights of children and young people in relation to local elections. “Children and young people are expecting the new municipal councils most of all to create places where they could be together, be safe and speak to each other,” Madise referred to a poll that had been carried out. “It was a very big wish of young people that their needs be noticed and that they have places to be together.”
In Madise’s words, campaigns for local elections can be carried out in youth centres and schools, because 16 and 17-year-olds have the right to vote, but there is a simple line to be drawn: “Schools and youth centres must not become the election bases of any political party.”
The Chancellor of Justice also answered questions from members of the Riigikogu.
During the debate, Marek Jürgenson (Centre Party), Lauri Läänemets (Social Democratic Party), Urmas Reinsalu (Isamaa), Peeter Ernits (Estonian Conservative People’s Party) and Toomas Kivimägi (Reform Party) took the floor on behalf of their factions.
The annual review of the Chancellor of Justice is available here (in Estonian).